LazyApply promises to apply to hundreds of jobs automatically. Here's what it actually delivers, what it costs, and whether the response rates justify it.
LazyApply has a simple pitch: install the Chrome extension, configure your preferences, and let it apply to hundreds of jobs on LinkedIn while you get on with your day. For job seekers exhausted by the repetitive mechanics of online applications, the appeal is obvious. But there's a gap between the number of applications it submits and the number of responses it generates — and understanding that gap is what this review is about.
TLDR
LazyApply automates LinkedIn Easy Apply, submitting applications quickly at high volume.
It sends the same untailored resume to every job. No keyword optimization, no per-role rewriting.
Desktop-only, Chrome extension. No mobile app.
Response rates are typically lower than tailored approaches because ATS systems filter generic resumes at high rates.
No free trial. Starts at approximately $29/month.
Worth it for a very specific use case. Not the right tool for most job seekers.
What LazyApply does
LazyApply is a Chrome extension that automates LinkedIn Easy Apply. Once installed, it reads your job search preferences, finds matching LinkedIn listings, and clicks through the Easy Apply flow automatically — submitting your profile and uploaded resume without manual input. It can process dozens of applications per day while you do other things.
The application tracking feature logs what was submitted, and the referral email generator can help you follow up with connections at target companies.
That's the product. It's relatively simple, and it does what it says.
The fundamental problem
The issue with LazyApply isn't what it does. It's what it doesn't do.
Every application goes out with the same resume, unchanged. LazyApply makes no attempt to match your resume language to the job description, identify missing keywords, or adjust your summary for the specific role. The cover letter, if included, is identical across every submission.
ATS software — used by the vast majority of employers — scores resumes based on how well they match the keywords and requirements of the specific job description. A generic resume submitted to a role with specific requirements will score lower than a tailored one, often below the threshold that gets it in front of a human reviewer. Jobscan's analysis consistently shows that tailored resumes outperform generic ones in ATS scoring.
The practical result: a meaningful proportion of LazyApply's high submission numbers never reach a human. High application count, lower-than-expected response rate.
Pricing
No free trial. LazyApply pricing starts at approximately $29/month with higher tiers for more monthly applications. Check their current pricing page for exact figures as these change.
What users actually report
User sentiment is genuinely mixed. Some users report getting interviews and credit LazyApply with getting their applications out at a volume they couldn't have managed manually. Others report submitting 200-300 applications over several weeks with minimal or no responses, eventually concluding that volume without tailoring doesn't produce results.
Several users on Reddit and review platforms also note that LazyApply has occasionally autofilled screening questions incorrectly — submitting wrong answers to questions about work authorization, salary expectations, or years of experience. An automatic rejection triggered by a wrong screening answer is worse than not applying at all.
There's also the LinkedIn terms of service question. LinkedIn technically prohibits automated tools, and some users report account restrictions after using LazyApply. Risk varies, but it's worth considering if your LinkedIn profile is important to you professionally.
The core problem is one of relevance versus volume. What LazyApply skips entirely — per-application tailoring — is precisely what determines whether applications survive ATS filtering. Ace takes the opposite approach: it rewrites your resume for each specific job before submitting it directly on company career pages, not just through LinkedIn Easy Apply.
Is LazyApply worth it?
Yes, in a narrow use case: You're specifically targeting smaller companies that post on LinkedIn and review applications manually rather than through ATS software. You're supplementing an existing tailored application strategy rather than replacing it. You understand that response rates will be lower and are playing a pure volume game.
No, for most job seekers: If you're applying to companies of any meaningful size, ATS filtering means generic resumes produce poor return. The $29+/month cost applied to a tool with consistently better response rates is a better investment.
The bottom line
LazyApply does what it says — it submits a lot of applications fast. But the model is fundamentally limited for most job seekers because every submission carries the same untailored resume. Volume without relevance doesn't beat ATS filtering; it produces more rejections faster. If you're going to invest in an auto-apply tool, the one thing you shouldn't compromise on is per-application tailoring. That's the difference between applications that reach human review and applications that don't.
For a direct comparison with a tool that does per-application tailoring automatically: Ace vs LazyApply. For a full overview of the category: Best AI Job Search Tools in 2026. And for understanding why ATS keyword matching is the core metric: How to Beat Applicant Tracking Systems in 2026.
If you want auto-apply that actually accounts for ATS scoring, Ace is free to start on iOS and Android. It tailors your resume for every job before submitting.
This review is written by the Ace team. We've done our best to represent LazyApply fairly based on publicly available information and user reviews. Always check LazyApply's current website for up-to-date pricing and features.
Try Ace free - tailored applications every time, on iOS and Android
FAQ
Does LazyApply actually work?
It does submit applications automatically through LinkedIn Easy Apply. Whether it produces interviews depends on your industry, the roles you're targeting, and how much ATS filtering is involved. Users applying to roles at smaller companies report better results than those applying to large employers with automated screening.
Is LazyApply safe for my LinkedIn account?
LinkedIn's terms of service prohibit automation tools. Some users report no issues; others report temporary account restrictions. The risk is real and worth factoring in if your LinkedIn presence is professionally important.
What's the best alternative to LazyApply?
Ace tailors your resume and cover letter for each job automatically and submits the full application on the company's career page — not just LinkedIn Easy Apply. Free to start on iOS and Android.
Does LazyApply work on Indeed or other job boards?
LazyApply is primarily focused on LinkedIn. It doesn't have the same functionality on Indeed or other job boards.
How does LazyApply compare to tools that tailor per application?
LazyApply prioritises volume; per-application tailoring tools like Ace prioritise relevance. At companies using ATS screening (the majority of any-size employers) tailored applications consistently produce higher response rates. High volume alone doesn't overcome the ATS disadvantage of sending a generic resume.
